Learning goals. Project a state onto an orthonormal
basis, retain the conjugation and cancellations, calculate conditional
states, and connect probabilities to repeated experiments.
3.1 A basis specifies a question
An orthonormal basis
satisfies
.
Projective measurement in this basis gives
For an ideal rank-one measurement, outcome
leaves the system in
up to global phase. The prior state determines probabilities; the
observed result determines the conditioned state afterward.
Writing
and multiplying by
gives
.
A basis change calculates new coordinates of the same vector. Physically
applying a gate changes the vector; a gate followed by Z measurement can
implement a different measurement basis.
3.2 One state, three full
calculations
Our recurring example is
Its norm squared is
3.2.1 Z basis
Similarly,
3.2.2 X basis
The squared modulus is
For the other outcome,
3.2.3 Y basis
Forming the bra conjugates the imaginary coefficient:
Now expand, including the terms that vanish:
For the negative outcome,
A negative amplitude is allowed; a negative probability is not. Each
basis has its own normalized distribution:
Basis
First outcome
Second outcome
Z
X
Y
Do not add all six probabilities. These are three different
experimental choices on freshly prepared copies.
Laboratory L03
— Projection workbench. Start with coefficients
and
.
Select Z, X, or Y; reveal the bra, expansion, cancellations, amplitude,
and modulus squared. Change the coefficients and sample a chosen number
of shots.
3.3 General formulas and a sign
check
For normalized
,
Check the Y sign rather than memorizing it:
If
,
the final term is
.
Divide by two to obtain
.
Real coefficients give balanced Y probabilities; an imaginary relative
coefficient need not.
3.4 Consecutive measurements
Prepare
,
measure Z, then measure X. Z gives 0 or 1 equally often. Either
conditioned state has balanced X probabilities. Therefore
Without the intermediate Z measurement, the final X outcome would be
with certainty. Ignoring a measurement record does not undo the physical
interaction.
For a projector
,
possibly of higher rank,
Only outcomes with
can be conditioned upon. A projector onto a subspace can retain
coherence inside that subspace. Parity checks in quantum error
correction exploit this fact.
3.5 Observables and expectation
values
If outcomes have numerical values
,
define
.
Then
For Pauli Z, eigenvalues
correspond to
.
The ket label 0 is not an eigenvalue zero. Our example gives
,
,
and
.
Variance is
.
Each Pauli squares to identity, so
.
Incompatible observables lack a shared complete eigenbasis. Their
uncertainty is not merely a poorly calibrated detector.
Laboratory L04
— Measurement practice. Generate an integer-coefficient state
and requested outcome. Enter a fraction or decimal; request a hint or
reveal the derivation step by step.
3.6 Exercises
3.1. Calculate all three-basis probabilities for
.
Show solution / guidance
Z:
.
X amplitudes:
,
giving
.
Y amplitudes:
,
giving
.
3.2. Replace
by
in the recurring example. What changes?
Show solution / guidance
Z and X probabilities remain unchanged. The imaginary part of
changes sign, exchanging Y probabilities:
,
.
3.3. A Z measurement returns 1. What happens on an
immediate repeated Z measurement, and if X measurement is inserted?
Show solution / guidance
The conditioned state is
,
so direct repetition returns 1 with certainty. Inserting X leaves
or
;
either gives final Z result 1 with probability
.
3.4. Verify orthonormality of
and
.
Find
for input
.
Show solution / guidance
Both norms are one and the overlap is
.
The projection is
,
giving probability
.
3.5. Find the shot-noise standard deviation of the
observed
fraction for the recurring example in 2,600 shots.
Show solution / guidance
.
This describes independent sampling, not preparation or measurement
bias.